Legal Opinion
Sher v. Allstate Insurance
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided May 28, 2013No. 10 Civ. 5644 (JGK)PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
JOHN G. KOELTL, District Judge:
The plaintiffs, Michael Sher and Paula Sher, bring this purported class action asserting several causes of action against the defendant, Allstate Insurance Company (“Allstate”). The plaintiffs’ claims arise out of Allstate’s alleged practice of requiring that insured property owners replace or complete repairs of damaged property within 180 days of receipt of an actual cash value payment from Allstate. Allstate requires the completion of such repairs or replacement before reimbursing insureds for such costs over-and-above the actual cash value…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Chambers v. Time Warner, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
- ATSI Communications, Inc. v. Shaar Fund, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
- Victor Paul v. Alberto Gonzales, Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Bhasker v. Kemper Cas. Ins. Co.District Court, D. New Mexico · 2018
- Clarex Ltd. v. Natixis Securities Americas LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2013
- 99 Wall Development Inc. v. Allied World Specialty Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2021
- Mizuta v. BanksDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2023
- OTG MANAGEMENT PHL LLC v. EMPLOYERS INSURANCE COMPANY OF WAUSAUDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2021
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.