Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

People v. Fuhrman

California Supreme Court

Decided August 28, 1997No. S055920Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in part

WERDEGAR, J., Concurring and Dissenting

I agree with the majority’s conclusion that prior felony convictions, to be counted as strikes, need not have been brought and tried separately. No such requirement appears in the statute. With respect, I disagree with the remainder of the opinion.

We held in People v. Superior Court (Romero) (1996) 13 Cal.4th 497, 529-530 [53 Cal.Rptr.2d 789, 917 P.2d 628] that Penal Code section 1385 gave trial judges discretionary power to dismiss prior felony conviction allegations in furtherance of justice. We also declared that our holding would be “fully…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Mempa v. RhaySupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. People v. Superior Court (Romero)California Supreme Court · 1996
  3. People v. BelmontesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
  4. In Re CortezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  5. People v. Eddie M.California Supreme Court · 2003

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API