Legal Opinion
Thomas v. Dosberg
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided April 29, 1998PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Petitioner is a certified home health aide who was employed by Harry E. Dosberg, a 93-year-old quadriplegic, to provide 24-hour care. After Dos-berg terminated petitioner’s employment, petitioner filed a complaint with respondent New York State Division of Human Rights (SDHR) alleging racial discrimination. Upon investigation, SDHR found that petitioner was employed in the domestic service of Dosberg (see, Executive Law § 292 [6]) and dismissed the complaint pursuant to section 297 (2) (a) of the Executive Law for lack of jurisdiction.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State Division of Human Rights v. Xerox Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1985
- Louis Harris & Associates, Inc. v. deLeonNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
- Carol Cox v. Acme Health Services, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
- State Division of Human Rights v. Xerox Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
3Cited by6 opinions
- St. Joseph's Hospital Health Center v. Department of HealthAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- Pavillion Agency, Inc. v. SpitzerNew York Supreme Court · 2005
- Adolph v. Hill-KirbyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2023
- Adolph v. Hill-KirbyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2023
- Annex Hotel v. New York State Division of Human RightsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.