Legal Opinion

Robinson v. State

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided September 23, 1983No. 82-141PublishedCited by 58 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Certiorari was granted to determine whether the Court of Criminal Appeals, 444 So.2d 882, had properly reversed the judgment of the trial court and remanded the cause for a new trial. We reverse and remand to the Court of Criminal Appeals.

The action of that Court in reversing the judgment of conviction was based upon, not an incomplete record, but the absence of any record disclosing a Boykin colloquy or an agreement to receive probation. Cf. Twyman v. State, 293 Ala. 75, 300 So.2d 124 (1974), and Alston v. State, 414 So.2d 488 (Ala.Cr.App. 1982), in which records were present.

In this case…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Watson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1980
  2. Twyman v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1974
  3. Tyus v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1977
  4. Robertson v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1940
  5. Ex Parte TyusSupreme Court of Alabama · 1977

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by58 opinions

  1. Dill v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1991
  2. Abbott v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1986
  3. Hunt v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1994
  4. Parish v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1985
  5. Gibson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1989

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API