Anderson v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
Mr. Presiding Justice Jones
delivered the opinion of the court.
Owen Anderson as administrator of the estate of Anton Sampo, deceased, recovered a judgment against the defendant railroad company for $2,000 and costs, because of personal injuries to said decedent.
No question is raised upon the pleadings or instructions to the jury, and there is but little controversy over the testimony. When the decedent received the injuries from which he died, he was an employee of the Marquette Cement Manufacturing Company. The important question in this case is whether the injuries received by him grew out…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Wicks v. Cuneo-Henneberry Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1925
- Keeran v. Peoria, Bloomington & Champaign Traction Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1917
- Goldsmith v. PayneIllinois Supreme Court · 1921
- St. Louis O'fal. Coal Co. v. Indus. Com.Illinois Supreme Court · 1927
- Kelly-Atkinson Construction Co. v. Foreman Brothers Banking Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1920
3Cited by7 opinions
- Christian v. Chicago & Illinois Midland Railway Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1952
- Walsh v. Central Cold Storage Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1944
- Doyle v. Penton Lumber Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1952
- Rehula v. BessertAppellate Court of Illinois · 1944
- Bryn v. Central R.R. Co. of N.J.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1935
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.