Legal Opinion

Anderson v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided August 15, 1928No. Gen. No. 7,827PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Presiding Justice Jones

delivered the opinion of the court.

Owen Anderson as administrator of the estate of Anton Sampo, deceased, recovered a judgment against the defendant railroad company for $2,000 and costs, because of personal injuries to said decedent.

No question is raised upon the pleadings or instructions to the jury, and there is but little controversy over the testimony. When the decedent received the injuries from which he died, he was an employee of the Marquette Cement Manufacturing Company. The important question in this case is whether the injuries received by him grew out…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Wicks v. Cuneo-Henneberry Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Keeran v. Peoria, Bloomington & Champaign Traction Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Goldsmith v. PayneIllinois Supreme Court · 1921
  4. St. Louis O'fal. Coal Co. v. Indus. Com.Illinois Supreme Court · 1927
  5. Kelly-Atkinson Construction Co. v. Foreman Brothers Banking Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1920

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Christian v. Chicago & Illinois Midland Railway Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Walsh v. Central Cold Storage Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1944
  3. Doyle v. Penton Lumber Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1952
  4. Rehula v. BessertAppellate Court of Illinois · 1944
  5. Bryn v. Central R.R. Co. of N.J.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1935

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API