Legal Opinion

Peterson v. State

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided May 25, 1926No. 24376PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDean, J.

Peterson, Shirley & Gunther, a firm of Omaha contractors, submittted a bid to the department of public works, of Nebraska, wherein it agreed to construct an earth and sand clay road, in Smiley Canyon in Sioux county, for $68,613.97, pursuant to federal aid project No. 102A.

This action was begun in Lancaster county to recover $47,428.72 which plaintiffs allege is the remainder due them, and unpaid, for the construction of the above-mentioned public highway. A jury was waived. Upon trial to the court plaintiffs recovered a judgment for $30,305.54, with interest thereon. From the judgment so…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Kihlberg v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Martinsburg & Potomac Railroad v. MarchSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  3. United States v. GleasonSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  4. United States v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  5. Chicago, Santa Fé & California Railroad v. PriceSupreme Court of the United States · 1891

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Schlesinger v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Roadmix Construction Corp. v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Walker v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1937
  4. City of Chadron v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1927
  5. State v. Tennessee Gas Transmission Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1956

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API