Ligon v. Potomac Electric Power Co.
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Per curiam
The sole question raised on this appeal is whether the trial court in a condemnation case properly ruled as a matter of law that the condemner had shown a necessity to take a strip "of the appellants’ property, for the purpose of erecting and maintaining an overhead power line, in fee simple rather than as an easement that would permit the quarrying of stone in the subsurface of the strip.
The cases recognize, and it is virtually conceded, that the choice as to the extent and type of taking must rest largely in the sound business judgment of the condemner, and that such choice will not be set…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Johnson v. Consolidated Gas, Electric Light & Power Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1947
- Lustine v. State Roads CommissionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1958
- Murphy v. State Roads CommissionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1930
- Webster v. Susquehanna Pole Line Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1910
- Potomac Electric Power Co. v. BirkettCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1958
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- County Commissioners v. SchrodelCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1990
- State Roads Commission v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1960
- Mayor of Baltimore City v. ValsamakiCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
- Bouton v. Potomac Edison Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1980
- Sollins v. Baltimore CountyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1969
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.