Legal Opinion
Vastano v. Killington Valley Real Estate
Supreme Court of Vermont
Decided February 24, 2010No. 08-167PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
¶ 1. In Vastano v. Killington Valley Real Estate, 2007 VT 33, 182 Vt. 550, 929 A.2d 720 (mem.) (Vastano I), we held that the defendant realtor’s failure to inform the plaintiff purchasers about ongoing environmental monitoring of a well for gasoline contamination constituted a material omission as a matter of law and a violation of the Consumer Fraud Act (CFA), 9 V.S.A. §§ 2451-2480n. We remanded to the trial court for a determination of damages. Following additional briefing, the court awarded plaintiffs $7,875, representing the sales commission earned by defendant Killington Valley Real…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Missouri v. Jenkins Ex Rel. AgyeiSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Myzel v. FieldsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1967
- L'ESPERANCE v. BenwareSupreme Court of Vermont · 2003
- Elkins v. Microsoft Corp.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2002
- Phoenix Airline Services, Inc. v. Metro Airlines, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1990
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Walsh v. Cluba and Good Stuff, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2015
- Soon Kwon v. EatonSupreme Court of Vermont · 2010
- Anderson v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Vermont · 2011
- Brennan-Centrella v. Ritz-Craft Corp. of Pa.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2019
- Dartmouth College v. KozaczekSupreme Court of Vermont · 2010
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.