Legal Opinion

(PC) Khademi v. Vanderwende

District Court, E.D. California

Decided August 20, 2019No. 2:18-cv-02798Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DAVOOD KHADEMI, No. 2:18-cv-2798 TLN AC P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 14 SEAN VANDERWENDE, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff, a county jail inmate proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, seeks relief 18 pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This proceeding was referred to this court by Local Rule 302 19 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). 20 Plaintiff has filed a first amended complaint (“FAC”), ECF No. 21, and a motion to 21 amend as well as several discovery-related motions and…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Gilbert B. Martinez v. Eddie Ylst, Superintendent, California Medical Facility SouthCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
  4. Ivey v. Board of Regents of University of AlaskaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
  5. Harry Franklin v. Ms. Murphy and Hoyt CuppCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API