United States v. Agnello
District Court, E.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
GERSHON, District Judge.
Defendant Carmine Agnello seeks to offer evidence of a mental condition, identified as bipolar disorder, to negate the intent required for the various crimes with which he is charged. The government moves to preclude such evidence. 1
In the Insanity Defense Reform Act of 1984, Congress limited the defense of insanity to where “the defendant, as a result of a severe mental disease or defect, was unable to appreciate the nature and quality or the wrongfulness of his acts.” 18 U.S.C. § 17(a). Congress further provided that “Mental disease or defect does…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- United States v. Willie George ChildressCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1995
- United States v. Karen CameronCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Pohlot, StephenCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987
- United States v. SchneiderCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1997
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- United States v. BumaginDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2015
- United States v. DupreDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2004
- United States v. AndrewsDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2011