Legal Opinion

In re the Marriage of Hughes

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided August 2, 2005No. 23613-7-IIIPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

¶1 In a default judgment, essential due process limits the relief a court can grant to that asked for in the petition or complaint. Here, Shawnna Hughes took a default dissolution decree varying significantly from the petition served on her husband, Carlos Hughes. In the default papers, Ms. Hughes changed her pregnancy status to pregnant and denied Mr. Hughes’ paternity. Further, Ms. Hughes failed to respond to the State’s support enforcement inquiry about her pregnancy status before she entered her default decree. At the State’s urging, the court vacated the decree after a hearing. Because…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Griggs v. Averbeck Realty, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Darrin v. GouldWashington Supreme Court · 1975
  3. In Re the Marriage of LittleWashington Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Southwest Washington Chapter, National Electrical Contractors Ass'n v. Pierce CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1983
  5. In the Matter of Marriage of TangCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1990

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. BLIGE v. TERRYNevada Supreme Court · 2023
  2. In Re The Marriage Of: Richard B. Ferguson And Pamela M. FergusonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API