Legal Opinion

Lee v. Newell

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1914No. 17,466PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from the district court for Holt county: James J. Harrington, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtLetton, J.

This is an action to subrogate the plaintiffs to the rights of Holt county to the foreclosure of a tax lien, upon certain lands of which they are not the owners, upon the ground that their agent and attorney paid the taxes upon the land by mistake, instead of purchasing the property at tax sale as he was directed to do. The prayer is that the apparent satisfaction of the tax lien be canceled, and that a foreclosure may be had. Defendants Newell disclaimed ownership, and alleged they had sold the land to Mary Butler. Afterwards Mary Butler was made a party defendant, and *210filed an answer…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Carr Hardware Co. v. Chicago Bonding & Surety Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1921
  2. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States v. PersonNebraska Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Criswell v. McKnightNebraska Supreme Court · 1930
  4. Stibor v. FarrellNebraska Supreme Court · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API