Legal Opinion

Fairfield Bar & Restaurant, Inc. v. Friedman

New York Supreme Court

Decided October 5, 1939PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtPecora, J.

Plaintiff, the owner of a restaurant, applies for a temporary injunction restraining the defendants from picketing in front of and in the vicinity of its establishment. The application is made on the conventional papers customarily used on motions for temporary injunctions in equity causes. The defendants claim that the controversy here is a “ labor dispute ” within the meaning of section 876-a of the Civil Practice Act, aud that pursuant to that section the court is precluded from granting injunctive relief upon mere affidavits. Defendants urge that inasmuch as plaintiff has failed to comply…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Lauf v. E. G. Shinner & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. People ex rel. Sandnes v. Sheriff of Kings CountyNew York Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Krip Holding Corp. v. CanavanNew York Supreme Court · 1936
  4. Mlle. Reif, Inc. v. RandauNew York Supreme Court · 1937

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Petrucci v. HoganNew York Supreme Court · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API