Legal Opinion
Petrucci v. Hogan
New York Supreme Court
Decided April 14, 1941PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLouis A. Valente, J.
Plaintiffs are former employees of the Interborough Rapid Transit System, having been connected with its operating and maintenance divisions. While in its employ they joined the Transport Workers Union of Greater New York, of which defendants are now officers. In June, 1940, the City of New York acquired the Interborough and plaintiffs then became city employees and were classified in its civil *481service. The Transport Workers Union had previously entered into a contract with the Interborough relating to the wages and working conditions of its employees, which contract, on April 3, 1940, was…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Senn v. Tile Layers Protective UnionSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Lauf v. E. G. Shinner & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- New Negro Alliance v. Sanitary Grocery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Exchange Bakery & Restaurant, Inc. v. RifkinNew York Court of Appeals · 1927
- National Protective Ass'n of Steam Fitters & Helpers v. CummingNew York Court of Appeals · 1902
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- City of Los Angeles v. Los Angeles Building & Construction Trades CouncilCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
- Board of Education of Community Unit School District No. 2 v. ReddingIllinois Supreme Court · 1965
- Delaware River & Bay Authority v. International Organization of Masters, Mates & PilotsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1965
- Erie County Water Authority v. KramerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1957
- Civil Service Forum v. New York City Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1957
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.