in the Interest of J.F.-g., a Child
Texas Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS ════════════ NO. 20-0378 ════════════ IN THE INTEREST OF J.F.-G., A CHILD ══════════════════════════════════════════════════ ON PETITION FOR REVIEW FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS ══════════════════════════════════════════════════ JUSTICE BLACKLOCK, joined by JUSTICE GUZMAN, JUSTICE DEVINE, and JUSTICE BUSBY, dissenting. The termination of parental rights “is one of the most intrusive actions available to the State.” N.S.M. v. Dall. Cnty. Child Welfare Unit,
747 S.W.2d 814, 815
(Tex. App.—Dallas 1987, no writ). Because of the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Texas Department of Human Services v. BoydTexas Supreme Court · 1987
- Holick v. SmithTexas Supreme Court · 1985
- TGS-NOPEC GEOPHYSICAL CO. v. CombsTexas Supreme Court · 2011
- In the Interest of E.N.C., J.A.C., S.A.L., N.A.G. and C.G.L.Texas Supreme Court · 2012
- Austin v. Michigan State Chamber of CommerceSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.