Legal Opinion

Roy v. Hammett Motors, Inc.

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided January 2, 1940No. 33935PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGriffith, J.

Appellee is a dealer in automobiles, including used cars. Watts was a salesman in appellee’s employ. Watts had'sought to induce one Charles Coleman to purchase a certain second-hand Dodge sedan, and Coleman had personally tested the car but found it unsatisfactory. Appellee thereupon made some repairs or improvements upon the vehicle and shortly thereafter, on February 8, 1930, Watts took it to the home of Coleman in the effort to renew the negotiations for its sale to Coleman. The latter stated that he was busy at that time and could not give any present attention to the matter and stated,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bertrand v. Mutual Motor Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1931
  2. Slaughter v. HolsombackMississippi Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Mosby v. KimballIllinois Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Graham v. American Employers' Ins. Co. of BostonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1937

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Usera Santiago v. González RodríguezSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1953
  2. Gregory ex rel. Gregory v. PatrickMississippi Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Burris v. ZurichOhio Court of Appeals · 2019
  4. Brown v. McAdoryMississippi Supreme Court · 1956
  5. Usera Santiago v. González RodríguezSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API