Legal Opinion

Gibson v. Eastern Rim & Wheel Co.

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided January 21, 1929No. 3820PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

The underlying question in this ease was the validity of tile patent involved’ because of the novelty of its alleged invention. No principles of law are involved.

The court below discussed the questions involved with unusual detail and thoroughness in an exhaustive opinion. The court has had the benefit of an equally thorough presentation of the ease by counsel for plaintiff in oral argument and comprehensive brief, but such presentation and our own study of the record fails to convince us the trial judge was in error. In view of his able opinion, and finding ourselves in accord therewith, we…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. S. S. Kresge Co. v. Winget Kickernick Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1938
  2. Gotz v. Universal Products Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1938
  3. Bocz v. Hudson Motor Car Co.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API