Legal Opinion

Morton & Hamner v. Valentine

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided March 15, 1860PublishedCited by 6 opinions

PPEAL from the District Court of the Parish of Carroll, Farrar, J.

1Opinion of the Court

Merrick, O. J.

At the November term of the Circuit Court of the Uuiled States for the Southern District of Mississippi, in the year 1841, the plaintiffs recovered judgment against the defendant for $5000, with eight per cent, interest thereon. The defendant changed his domicil to Louisiana about January 1st, 1846, but was in the habit of making frequent returns to Mississippi on business.

Iu 1850, the plaintiffs sued out a writ of scire facias upon the judgment, which was returned as to Valentine, the defendant, non est inventus. A second writ was issued in 1851, and returned executed September…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Pillet v. EdgarSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1843

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Dulin v. McCawWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Lawson v. JeffriesMississippi Supreme Court · 1873
  3. Cohn v. HoffmanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1885
  4. Roper v. Monroe Grocer Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1930
  5. Johnson v. FletcherMississippi Supreme Court · 1877

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API