Legal Opinion

United States Ex Rel. Farmer v. Kaufman

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided September 10, 1990No. 90 Civ. 35 (SWK)PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

KRAM, District Judge.

This action, brought purportedly on behalf of the United States by an attorney pro se, seeks declaratory relief relating to the famous trial and sentencing of Julius and Ethel Rosenberg. Currently before the Court is defendant Judge Kaufman’s motion to dismiss the Complaint.

BACKGROUND

On August 17,1950 the Rosenbergs were indicted for conspiring, between 1944 and 1950, to violate the Espionage Act of 1917. 1 There is some controversy about what version of that statute was in effect at the time. For purposes of this motion to dismiss, the Court…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Valley Forge Christian College v. Americans United for Separation of Church and State, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Simon v. Eastern Kentucky Welfare Rights OrganizationSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Maryland Casualty Co. v. Pacific Coal & Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  5. Linda R. S. v. Richard D.Supreme Court of the United States · 1973

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Vasile v. Dean Witter Reynolds Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1998
  2. Garay v. U.S. BancorpDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2004
  3. Gilbert v. Social Security CommissionDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2022
  4. Gilbert v. SoldanDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2022
  5. Owens v. John Doe of Store Vintage Wine and SpiritsDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2019

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API