Legal Opinion

Cantu v. Central Power & Light Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided April 15, 1931No. 8597PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.

F. Cantu owns certain tracts of land in Val Verde county over and across which the Illinois Pipe Line Company has laid a pipe line to be used in transporting petroleum oil. The right of way and easement occupied by the pipe line was granted by Cantu to the pipe line company through a certain written contract, in which Cantu did “⅜ * * grant and release to the Illinois Pipe Line Company, its Successors and assigns, the right of way to lay, maintain, operate and remove a pipe line, and erect, maintain and operate telegraph or telephone lines, if the same be thought necessary by said grantee. *…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Marcus Cable Associates, L.P. v. KrohnTexas Supreme Court · 2002
  2. San Jacinto Sand Co. v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1968
  3. Centerpoint Energy Houston Electric LLC v. Bluebonnet Drive, Ltd., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2008
  4. Johnson v. Southwestern Public Service Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)1985
  5. CenterPoint Energy Houston Electric LLC and SprintCom, Inc. v. Bluebonnet Drive, Ltd., and Petro-Guard Company, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2008

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API