C. W. Wright Construction Co. v. Brannan
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Dissent
Hornby, J.,
filed the following dissenting opinion.
The majority saw no basis for a determination that there was any reasonable probability that the father of Bennie Thomas Brannan might resume supporting his son in the *406foreseeable future on the date of the injury from which the father died. I disagree because I believe there was evidence from.which the trier of facts could rationally find a reasonable probability that the mother of Bennie could again discover the whereabouts of the boy’s father and compel him to support his son.
After Bennie’s mother and father had separated the father…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Merrill v. Penasco Lumber Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1922
- In re CarrollIndiana Court of Appeals · 1917
- Ocean Accident & Guarantee Corp. v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1928
- Meyler v. Mayor and City CouncilCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1941
- Havre De Grace Fireworks Co. v. HoweCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1963
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.