Legal Opinion

Vasey v. Board of Trustees

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided June 15, 1871PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Washington county; the Hon. Silas L. Bryan, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Thornton

The facts of this case are briefly as follows:

Benjamin and Fountain Seawell purchased the land in controversy, in the year 1855. In 1860, they, with their wives, executed a mortgage on the premises to appellees, to secure the payment of a note then signed by them and Samuel Sea-well. Thomas Seawell signed the note sometime after the execution of the mortgage.

It is claimed, that parol partition was made between the two Seawells soon after the purchase. There was no possession in conformity therewith. Benjamin was never in possession, and the occupancy of Fountain was of the whole tract, so far…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Tomlin v. HilyardIllinois Supreme Court · 1867
  2. Brown v. CoonIllinois Supreme Court · 1864
  3. Wright v. DunningIllinois Supreme Court · 1867
  4. Buck v. ConlogueIllinois Supreme Court · 1868
  5. Hewitt v. TempletonIllinois Supreme Court · 1868

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Rasmussen v. RasmussenIllinois Supreme Court · 1938
  2. McBride v. HawthorneIllinois Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Wagenbach v. PHI Financial Services, Inc. (In Re Wagenbach)United States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. Illinois · 1999
  4. Asher v. MitchellIllinois Supreme Court · 1879
  5. Blatchley v. Dakota Land & Cattle Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1914

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API