Legal Opinion

Rasmussen v. Rasmussen

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided February 16, 1938No. 24421. Reversed and remandedPublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stone

Appellants seek review of that portion of a decree for partition, entered by the circuit court of Kane county, finding that appellee, as the widow of Robert Rasmussen, deceased, is entitled to a homestead in the property involved in the proceeding.

Robert Rasmussen, father of the appellants, died intestate on August 18, 1926, seized in fee simple of the improved lot involved here. It was occupied by him as a homestead. He left the appellee, his widow, the appellants and three other sons as his heirs-at-law. The appellee continued to occupy the premises as her homestead until some months after…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Jackson v. SackettIllinois Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Cabeen v. MulliganIllinois Supreme Court · 1865
  3. Dunbar v. DunbarIllinois Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Shepard v. BrewerIllinois Supreme Court · 1872
  5. Loveless v. ThomasIllinois Supreme Court · 1894

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Fleischhauer v. BILSTAD, GRAY ET UXOregon Supreme Court · 1963
  2. In Re MoneerUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 1995
  3. In Re LantzUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 2011
  4. In Re RossUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 1997
  5. Code v. LondonWashington Supreme Court · 1947

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API