New Silver Bell Mining Co v. County of Lewis & Clark
Montana Supreme Court
1DissentJustice Angstman
I think the opinion prepared by Mr. Justice Davis is erroneous in holding that the payments made to plaintiff constitute royalties taxable as net proceeds.
A copy of the agreement between plaintiff and Swansea Mines, Inc. was attached to the complaint and made a part of it. By its terms Swansea Mines, Inc. was given the exclusive right to purchase the mining claims described. The purchase price was fixed by the agreement at $45,000 of which $5,481.31 had already been paid when the agreement was made, leaving a balance due of $39,518.69.
Swansea Mines, Inc. was to make payments to the plaintiff…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Homestake Exploration Corp. v. SchoreggeMontana Supreme Court · 1928
- Byrne v. Fulton Oil Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1929
- Williard v. Federal Surety Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1932
- Forbes v. Mid-Northern Oil Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1935
- Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. Gas Development Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1936
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.