Legal Opinion
Arlook v. S. Lichtenberg & Co.
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided January 16, 1992No. 91-8162PublishedCited by 48 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BIRCH, Circuit Judge:
Ordinarily, labor dispute cases can be handled through the regular procedure authorized by the National Labor Relations Act (the “NLRA”); namely, administrative resolution by the National Labor Relations Board (the “Board”) followed when necessary by enforcement in the Courts of Appeals. However, because the administrative machinery of labor dispute resolution moves slowly, interim injunctive relief is sometimes necessary in order to preserve the Board’s remedial power. For such exceptional cases, Congress has provided the Board with the ability to petition a district…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Harold A. Boire Etc. v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers of America, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
- Boire v. Pilot Freight Carriers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
- Elizabeth Kinney, Regional Director of the Thirteenth Region of the National Labor Relations Board v. Pioneer PressCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
- Kobell v. Suburban Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
- Gottfried v. FrankelCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1987
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by48 opinions
- American Civil Liberties Union of Florida, Inc. v. Miami-Dade County School BoardCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2009
- Miller v. California Pacific Medical CenterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- Muffley Ex Rel. NLRB v. Spartan Mining Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2009
- Intergraph Corporation v. Intel CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
- Serra Chevrolet, Inc. v. General Motors Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2006
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.