Legal Opinion
State v. Gadd
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided March 1, 1990No. CA 11418PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGrady, J.
Appellant Phillip D. Gadd appeals his conviction of possessing a Schedule II controlled substance, specifically cocaine, a violation of R.C. 2925.11. Before trial Gadd filed a motion to suppress evidence. He also filed an application for treatment in lieu of conviction under R.C. 2951.041. At a hearing the trial court denied both the motion and application. Gadd then pleaded no contest to the charge and was sentenced to one year in the Ohio State Reformatory. Gadd submits two assignments of error for our consideration.
Appellant first contends that the trial court erred in denying his motion…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- United States v. PlaceSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- State v. AdamsOhio Supreme Court · 1980
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. ShoafOhio Court of Appeals · 2000
- State v. SchmidtOhio Court of Appeals · 2002
- State v. Casto, Ca2008-08-033 (2-23-2009)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2009
- State v. BakerOhio Court of Appeals · 1998
- State v. Abi-AazarOhio Court of Appeals · 2002
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.