Legal Opinion
State v. Casto, Ca2008-08-033 (2-23-2009)
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided February 23, 2009No. CA2008-08-033PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
{¶ 1} Plaintiff-appellant, the state of Ohio, appeals the decision of the Clinton County Court of Common Pleas granting defendant-appellee, Bryan K. Casto's, motion for intervention in lieu of a conviction for drug possession. For the reasons discussed below, we affirm the decision of the trial court.
{¶ 2} On September 20, 2007, appellee was indicted on one count of possession of cocaine in violation of R.C. 2925.11, a felony of the fifth degree. Appellee pled not guilty to the charge and filed a motion for intervention in lieu of conviction on January 31, 2008. Appellee argued that he…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- State v. HairstonOhio Supreme Court · 2004
- Cleveland Electric Illuminating Co. v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1988
- Bailey v. Republic Engineered Steels, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 2001
- State v. SufronkoOhio Court of Appeals · 1995
- State v. CoffmanOhio Supreme Court · 2001
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- State v. RoomeOhio Court of Appeals · 2017
- State v. PanzecaOhio Court of Appeals · 2020
- State v. LagesonOhio Court of Appeals · 2019
- Cleveland v. McCruelOhio Court of Appeals · 2017
- State v. CrawfordOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.