Legal Opinion

Los Angeles Farming & Milling Co. v. Hoff

California Supreme Court

Decided October 10, 1893No. 19,180Published

APPEAL from .Superior Court, Los Angeles County; Walter Van Dyke, Judge. Ejectment by the Los Angeles Farming and Milling Company against Hoff and others. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendants appeal.

1Per curiam

This is an action of ejectment brought against the defendant Hoff and over one hundred others to recover possession of the south half of the San Fernando rancho in Los Angeles county. Upon the facts shown at the trial we think there can be no question as to the right of the plaintiff to recover in this action, and the question of error in the instructions becomes immaterial. The supreme court of the United States, in a recent decision, has construed the act of Congress of February 25, 1885, and in effect answered every proposition upon which the appellants rely herein Cameron v. United…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Cameron v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  2. Baird v. CrankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Rourke v. McNallyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  4. United States v. BrandesteinDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1887

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API