Commonwealth v. Moore
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Concurring in part, dissenting in part
Concurring and Dissenting Opinion by
Spaeth, J.:
Under the Act of October 17, 1969, P. L. 259, §18, as amended by the Act of July 14, 1971, P. L. 224, No. 45, §1, 17 P.S. §711.18, a defendant is not entitled to a jury trial in the Municipal Court; however, if convicted by the Municipal Court Judge, he may appeal to the Court of Common Pleas Avhere he will receive a trial *64de novo, which, if he chooses, may be a trial by jury. No doubt some defendants will be deterred from appealing and thereby from exercising their right to a jury trial if the Common Pleas judge can, without articulating any…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Colten v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- State v. SparrowSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
- Mann v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1971
- Commonwealth v. HarperSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.