Rushing v. Spreen
Court of Appeals of Texas
Appeal from District Court, Austin County; L. W. Moore, Judge. Action by H. E. Spreen against C. C. Rushing and others. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant named appeals.
1Opinion of the Court
This is the second appeal in this case, 112 S.W. 98. The nature of the suit is stated in the opinion of Mr. Chief Justice Pleasants in the volume cited, and it is not necessary to restate it, further than to say that, after the case was reversed, the plaintiff amended his petition and made C. C. Rushing a party defendant, and he filed a general denial. A judgment was rendered against both the Wittliffs and Rushing, and the latter has appealed.
The trial judge filed the following findings of fact and conclusions of law:
"Findings of Fact.
"(1) I find that H. F. Spreen, plaintiff, and John Spreen,…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Witliff v. SpreenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1908
3Cited by6 opinions
- Penn v. Garabed GulbenkianCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1951
- Owen v. KingCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1935
- Whitman v. AldrichCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1913
- Davisson v. Eastland CountyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1927
- Henry v. McConnellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1966
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.