Legal Opinion

Penn v. Garabed Gulbenkian

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided October 5, 1951No. 14390PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

YOUNG, Justice.

Appellees’ recovery in amount of $18,250 followed a hearing on their motion for summary judgment. Rule 166-A, Texas Rules of Civil Procedure.

Plaintiffs below were the surviving heirs of Kerope Gulbenkian, a citizen of New York State, who died in 1940; their cause of action being in substance that Gulben-kian, owner of a certain patented formula, had, in December 1939, entered into an agreement with defendant Penn whereby exclusive right to manufacture, sell and use said invention was granted to the latter; that under terms of the license, said Penn became bound and obligated to…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Stevens v. Howard D. Johnson Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1950
  2. Doehler Metal Furniture Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1945
  3. Meissner v. Standard Railway Equipment Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1908
  4. Zig Zag Spring Co. v. Comfort Spring CorporationDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1950
  5. Rowe v. BlanchardWisconsin Supreme Court · 1864

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Gulbenkian v. PennTexas Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Garza v. CTX MORTG. CO., LLC, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2009
  3. Kelty v. Travelers Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1965
  4. Dallas Cowboys Football Club, Inc. v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1961
  5. Seale v. MuseCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1961

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API