Redman v. Gulnac
California Supreme Court
Appeal from the District Court of the Third Judicial District, ■ Santa Clara County. The opinion of the Court contains the facts.
1Opinion of the CourtMurray, C. J.
Bryan, J., concurred.
It was error, after the jury had retired, to allow them to come into Court and instruct them, in the absence of the parties or their counsels.
Such instructions will be considered important if the contrary is not shown, from the very fact that the jury have asked for them. The certificate of the Judge of the Court below is a sufficient authentication of the statement. An appellant cannot be defeated of his rights by any such proceeding. If the respondent did not think proper to file amendments, or the Judge to correct the statement, the certificate of that fact by the…
2Cited by8 opinions
- Nelson v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1937
- Addy v. StewartIdaho Supreme Court · 1949
- Chapman v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1870
- State v. MeagherMissouri Court of Appeals · 1892
- Doyle v. United StatesUnited States Circuit Court · 1881
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.