Legal Opinion

People ex rel. Simmons v. Ham

New York Supreme Court

Decided October 15, 1907PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Application for an order requiring the county clerk of Dutchess county to print upon the official ballot the names of the Republican candidates for town officers in the town of Milan.

1Opinion of the CourtMorschauser, J.

Application is made why the Dutchess county clerk should not print upon the regular official ballot, to be printed for the ensuing election, the names of the Republican candidates for the town officers of the town of Milan, this county, as filed by the party nomination certificate with him October 12, 1907, and why he should not print the names therein certified on the regular ticket.

It is claimed that the certificates were not filed in his office until the 12th day of October, 1907, twenty-four days *113prior to election, when the same should have been filed on the 11th day of October, 1907.

The…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In re CuddebackAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896
  2. In re HalpinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1905

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Donohoe v. ShearerWashington Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Bayne v. GlissonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1974
  3. Clegg v. BENNION, SECRETARY OF STATEUtah Supreme Court · 1952
  4. State Ex Rel. Englert v. MeierNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1962
  5. State, Ex Rel. Mihlbaugh v. BogartOhio Court of Appeals · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API