Legal Opinion
State of Tennessee Ex Rel. Davis v. Hartman
District Court, E.D. Tennessee
Decided October 27, 1969No. 2384PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
NEESE, District Judge.
This is an action for damages for violation of the plaintiff’s civil rights. 42 U.S.C. §§ 1981, 1983. The four remaining defendants have filed respective motions for a dismissal of the complaint as to each of them.
The defendant sheriff Hartman contends that the complaint fails to state a claim against him on which relief can be granted, Rule 12(b) (6), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, in that no violation by him of the plaintiff’s civil rights is alleged to have proximately caused the injuries of which the plaintiff complains. There is no…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Monroe v. PapeSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Basista v. WeirCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1965
- Deane Hill Country Club, Inc. v. City of Knoxville and George F. McCanless Attorney General of TennesseeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1967
- State Ex Rel. Harbin v. DunnCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1943
3Cited by10 opinions
- Bennett v. GravelleDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1971
- Shires v. Magnavox Co.District Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1977
- Garza v. Chicago Health Clubs, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1971
- Geir v. Educational Service Unit No. 16District Court, D. Nebraska · 1992
- Campbell v. BucklesDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1977
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.