Legal Opinion
Burbank v. OFFICE OF ATTY. GEN. OF STATE OF CONNECTICUT
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided January 21, 2003No. CIV.A.3:99 CV 1608 CPublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
DRONEY, District Judge.
I. Introduction
The plaintiff, Harold Haley Burbank II, brought this action alleging that the defendants, the Office of the Attorney General of the State of Connecticut (“Office of the Attorney General”) and Attorney General Richard Blumenthal (“Blumenthal”), violated certain of his rights under the United States Constitution and Connecticut state law when they failed to hire him as an Assistant Attorney General.
On September 21, 2000, this Court granted in part and denied in part the defendants’ motion to dismiss. Pursuant…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Kentucky v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Jett v. Dallas Independent School DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Martires v. State of Connecticut Dept. of TransportationDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2009
- Bond v. City of MiddletownDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2005
- Jackson v. Post University, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2011
- Thompson v. Connecticut State UniversityDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2006
- Weber v. Fujifilm Medical Systems U.S.A., Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2012
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.