Legal Opinion
Martires v. State of Connecticut Dept. of Transportation
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided January 22, 2009No. 3:05-cv-1371 (CFD)PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
CHRISTOPHER F. DRONEY, District Judge.
Celeste Mártires brought this action against her employer, the Connecticut De*432partment of Transportation (“DOT”), for alleged violations of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (“Title VII”), 42 U.S.C. § 2000e, et seq. (Count One) and 42 U.S.C. § 1981 (Count Two), as well as for negligent and intentional infliction of emotional distress (Counts Three and Four) and negligent supervision (Count Five). The DOT has submitted a motion for summary judgment, which the Court grants for the following reasons.
I. Background1
Má…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Faragher v. City of Boca RatonSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Erickson v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2019
- Hetelekidis v. SaulDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2019
- Levesque v. SaulDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2019
- Martires v. Connecticut Dept. of Transp.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2009
- McDowell v. SaulDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2019
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.