SORIANO-VINO v. Holder
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by Judge RAWLINSON; Concurrence by Judge ZOUHARY.
OPINION
RAWLINSON, Circuit Judge:
This case requires us to interpret and apply the confidentiality provision of the statute governing the Special Agricultural Workers program (SAW). See 8 U.S.C. § 1160. Because we conclude that the confidentiality provisions were not contravened during the inspection at issue in this case, we deny the petition for review.
I. BACKGROUND
This case originated at an inspection checkpoint in the Los Angeles International Airport. Appellant Lourdes VinoSoriano (Soriano) was returning from the Philippines when she…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Shrestha v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Rivera v. MukaseyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- United States v. Zenon HernandezCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
- Ali Padash v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- United States v. Encarnacion Gonzalez-VillaloboCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- Uddin v. MayorkasDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2012
- Singh v. GarlandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2024
- Corpeno-Romero v. GarlandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2024
- Sergio Hernandez Flores v. Jeffrey RosenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020