Legal Opinion

Pestal v. O'Donnell

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided March 28, 1927No. 11,737PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Sheaeor

Action for specific performance brought by 0 ’Donnell against Pestal. Judgment for plaintiff O’Donnell, and defendant Pestal brings the case here and applies for supersedeas. The plaintiff in error will he hereinafter referred to as the defendant, and the defendant in error as the plaintiff.

On August 12, 1925, plaintiff was the owner of a half section of land located about thirteen miles from Lamar, with water rights consisting of 144 shares in the Ft. Lyon Canal Company, and defendant was' the owner of residence property in the city of Lamar. On that date the parties met for the first time,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Sellar v. ClellandSupreme Court of Colorado · 1875
  2. Davis v. PurselSupreme Court of Colorado · 1913
  3. Hawkins v. ElstonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1914
  4. Lewis v. WinslowSupreme Court of Colorado · 1925

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Phillips Petroleum Co. v. OldlandCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1951
  2. J. H. Hincke Printing Co. v. BaileySupreme Court of Colorado · 1928
  3. Troutman v. StilesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1930
  4. Defeo v. SmithSupreme Court of Colorado · 1949
  5. Muller v. GuinnSupreme Court of Colorado · 1927

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API