Legal Opinion
Lopata v. Bemis Company, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided October 16, 1974No. Civ. A. 72-1718PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
TROUTMAN, District Judge.
Presently before the Court in this personal injury diversity action is the defendant’s motion for summary judgment pursuant to F.R.Civ.P. 56. For the reasons which we set forth in this memorandum, defendant’s motion will be granted.
The plaintiff, a Pennsylvania resident, was injured at his employer’s plant in New Jersey on February 2, 1971, while he was attempting to unjam an allegedly defective fiberglass insulation manufacturing machine. Excess rolls of insulation had accumulated at the end of the device causing a blockage which plaintiff tried…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Sylvester Lockhart, Jr. v. Charles A. Hoenstine, Prothonotary of the Superior Court of PennsylvaniaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1969
- Kloberdanz v. Joy Manufacturing CompanyDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1968
- Farris v. Glen Alden Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
- Shane v. Hobam, IncorporatedDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1971
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Turner v. Bituminous Casualty Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1976
- Philadelphia Electric Company v. Hercules, Inc. And Gould, Inc. Appeal of Hercules, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
- Berg Chilling Systems, Inc. v. Hull Corporation Sp Industries, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2006
- Dawejko v. Jorgensen Steel Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- Charles Travis and Jean Travis v. Harris Corp., Harris-Intertype Corporation, Sheridan Division and Bruno MacHinery CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1977
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.