Legal Opinion

Loomis v. Montrose Borough

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania

Decided July 8, 2021No. 3:20-cv-01610Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA KRYSTLE LOOMIS, : CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:20-CV-1610 : Plaintiff : (Judge Conner) : v. : : MONTROSE BOROUGH POLICE : DEPARTMENT, JOSHUA DIDDICK, : and DOLLAR GENERAL, : : Defendants : MEMORANDUM Plaintiff Krystle Loomis (“Loomis”) advances civil rights claims against defendant Officer Joshua Diddick (“Officer Diddick”) and defendant Montrose Borough Police Department (the “Department”) pursuant to

42 U.S.C. § 1983

et seq., and an invasion of privacy claim against defendant Dollar General (“Dollar General”). Officer Diddick…

2Cases cited35 opinions

Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
Pearson v. CallahanSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
Kentucky v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1985

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.