Hopper v. City of Prattville
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
HOOPER, Chief Justice.
In denying the petition for the writ of certiorari, we do not wish to be understood as approving all the language, reasons, or statements of law in the Court of Criminal Appeals’ opinion. (Hopper v. City of Prattville, 781 So.2d 346 (Ala.Crim.App.2000).) See § 32-5A-88, Ala.Code 1975; House v. State, 380 So.2d 940, 942-43 (Ala.1979) (stating the general rule as to what constitutes a material variance); Lunceford v. City of Northport, 555 So.2d 246, 252 (Ala.Crim.App.1988) (if location is a material allegation, then it is material to the charge).
WRIT DENIED.
MADDOX, COOK,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- House v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1979
- Lunceford v. City of NorthportCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1988
- Hopper v. City of PrattvilleCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2000