Legal Opinion

Universal Foundry Co. v. Industrial Commission

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided March 9, 1937PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRosenberry, C. J.

The plaintiffs contend that there existed no condition of dependency within the meaning of sec. 102.49 (2), Stats., which provides:

“Sec. 102.49. Additional death benefit for children, state fund. (1) . . .
“(2) A child lawfully adopted by the deceased employee and the surviving spouse, prior to the time of the injury, and a child not his own by birth or adoption but living with him *314as a member of his family at the time of the injury shall for the purpose of this section be taken as a child by their- marriage.”

The defendants contend that the award was not made under sec. 102.49 ( 2) but under…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Interlake Pulp & Paper Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1925

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Larson v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human RelationsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Waunakee Canning Corp. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Robinson Foundry, Inc. v. MoonCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1987
  4. Rogers v. Texas Employers' Ins. Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1949
  5. Krueger v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1940

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API