In re Nontestimonial Identification Order Directed to R.H.

Defendant R.H. appeals from an order of the Lamoille District Court holding him in civil contempt for refusing to comply *228with a nontestimonial identification order that required him to submit to the collection of cheek epithelial cells (saliva) by swabbing the interior of his mouth. On appeal, defendant argues that (1) the affidavit filed in support of the nontestimonial identification order does not show reasonable grounds to suspect that he committed the crime, and (2) Article 11 of the Vermont Constitution and.the Fourth Amendment of the United States Constitution require probable cause…