Legal Opinion

Marks v. Ackerman, Att'y General

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided March 20, 1951No. 2814PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT BY

LE BARON, J.

The Territory of Hawaii by its attorney general filed an action in eminent domain at law to condemn certain land belonging to and in actual possession of Elizabeth Loy Mc-Candless Marks for the public use of a highway of limited access design and for that of an access road thereto as well as for that of ditches, culverts and other works necessary and incident thereto within the over-all purpose for which the land is sought to be condemned. For convenience, the Territory of Hawaii will be hereinafter called the “plaintiff” and Elizabeth Loy McCandless Marks…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Osborne v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1893
  2. Lone Star Gas Co. v. City of Fort WorthTexas Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Dotson v. BurchettCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1945
  4. King ex rel. Republic of Hawaii v. Oahu Railway & Land Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1899
  5. State Highway Department v. H. G. Hastings Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1938

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Coon v. City and County of HonoluluHawaii Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Hawaii's Thousand Friends v. AndersonHawaii Supreme Court · 1989
  3. County of Hawai'i v. C & J Coupe Family Ltd. PartnershipHawaii Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Helela v. State of HawaiiHawaii Supreme Court · 1966
  5. Wilson Etc. v. Stainback, gov.S.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1951

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API