Legal Opinion

Matter of Marriage of Menard

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 13, 2002No. C89-1024DR; A113218PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchuman, J.

Husband appeals from a trial court judgment that awarded wife a share of his “voluntary separation incentive” (VSI) benefits from the military. The court found that VSI payments were the “functional equivalent” of retirement benefits and therefore marital property under the terms of the dissolution judgment. Husband argues that wife’s claim is barred by laches and equitable estoppel and, if not, then it fails on the merits because VSI benefits are not retirement benefits. Those arguments did not persuade the trial court, and they do not persuade us either. We therefore affirm.

The parties’…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. McCarty v. McCartySupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Mansell v. MansellSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Wiggins v. Barrett & Associates, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1983
  4. McIver v. NormanOregon Supreme Court · 1948
  5. Paulson v. Western Life InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1981

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Bergerson v. Salem-Keizer School DistrictCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
  2. Eichner v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
  3. Frasier v. NolanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API