O'Gorman v. Fink
Wisconsin Supreme Court
APPEAL from the County Court of Mihoaukee County. The facts are stated in the opinion. The plaintiff appealed from a judgment against him for the costs of the action.
1Opinion of the Court
Conn, 0. J.
The facts upon which the questions of law arise in this case are these: Prior to the 9th day of July, 1880, the plaintiff, B. Goldman, and Gustav Jordens were ■engaged as partners in manufacturing and dealing in shoes .and slippers in Milwaukee, under the firm name of B. Goldman & Co. On that day the defendant, as marshal, levied upon the entire stock of goods, material, tools, and machinery ■of the firm, by virtue of executions issued on judgments recovered against the copartners in the United States circuit ■court. This action is for a conversion of a portion of this property,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Gaylord, Son & Co. v. M. Imhoff & Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1875
- Gilman v. WilliamsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1859
- Russell v. LennonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1876
- Burns & Smucker v. Harris & AllenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1872
- West v. WardWisconsin Supreme Court · 1870
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- In re FriedrichCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1900
- Village of Westby v. BekkedalWisconsin Supreme Court · 1920
- Noyes v. BeldingSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1894
- Goudy v. WerbeIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
- Lee v. Bradley Fertilizer Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1902
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.