Legal Opinion

Ryan v. LUMBERMEN'S MUTUAL CASUALTY COMPANY

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided October 2, 1972PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ERBY L. JENKINS, Special Justice.

This is a workmen’s compensation case. The plaintiff, Edward M. Ryan, Jr., brought suit after the one year Statute of Limitations had run, alleging that the defendant was estopped from denying the claim. The defendant filed a motion to dismiss; the Chancellor sustained the motion, and the plaintiff has appealed.

The question for the Court to decide is whether or not under the facts the defendant is estopped from asserting the Statute of Limitations as a defense.

For the purpose of this appeal it may be conceded that on February 25, 1970, the plaintiff was…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Glus v. Brooklyn Eastern District TerminalSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  2. Waugh v. LennardArizona Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Provident Washington Insurance Company v. ReeseTennessee Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Saylor v. TrotterTennessee Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Tyson v. Seaport Grain, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1965

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Cracker Barrel Old Country Store, Inc. v. EppersonTennessee Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Winton v. Johnson & Dix Fuel Corp.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1986
  3. Blocker v. Regional Medical Center at MemphisTennessee Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Gabovitz v. State Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  5. Lusk v. Consolidated Aluminum Corp.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1983

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API