Legal Opinion

George B. Scrambling Co. v. Tennant Drug Co.

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided April 25, 1927PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLevine, J.

The parties in this action appear in the reverse order to that which they occupied in the court of common pleas. We shall refer to them for convenience according to their respective positions in the lower court.

The plaintiff, the Tennant Drug Company, instituted an action against the defendants, the George B. Scrambling Company, the J. B. Moos Company, and the Wallace & Schwarz Company, for malicious prosecution, alleging in the petition that the defendants had, without probable cause, filed a petition in bankruptcy against plaintiff in the United States District Court for the Northern…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Central Passenger Railway Co. v. KuhnCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1888
  2. Wheeler v. HansonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1894
  3. San Antonio & Aransas Pass Railway Co. v. BowlesTexas Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Fay v. GuynonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1881
  5. Hall ex rel. Hall v. McClureSupreme Court of Kansas · 1923

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Prudential Ins. Co. of America v. FaulknerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1934
  2. Bakken v. LewisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1947
  3. Conte v. General Housewares Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
  4. Conte v. Gen Housewares CorpCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
  5. Erik Conte v. General Housewares Corporation, Dayton Power & Light CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API