Legal Opinion
United States v. James
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided January 27, 2003No. CR. 01-50055-01, CIV. 03-40018PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER
GADOLA, District Judge.
Before the Court is Defendant-Petitioner’s Motion for Temporary Restraining Order (“TRO”), accepted for filing on January 22, 2003. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 65(b); E.D. Mich. LR 65.1. The Motion requests a TRO to enjoin the Bureau of Prisons (“BOP”) from transferring him from a federal community corrections center to a federal prison. Such a transfer, also known as a re-designation, could occur as early as January 23, 2003. Because of these tight time constraints, no response from the Government was before the Court. For the reasons…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- United States v. TuckerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Townsend v. BurkeSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Roberts v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- United States v. Firooz JaliliCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991
- Robert Jinx Castro v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Monahan v. WinnDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2003
- Colton v. AshcroftDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2004
- Hacker v. Federal Bureau of PrisonsDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2006
- Howard v. AshcroftDistrict Court, M.D. Louisiana · 2003
- Cohn v. Federal Bureau of PrisonsDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2004
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.