Legal Opinion

Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Green

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided September 6, 1925PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Chambliss

An elaborate petition to rehear is presented. The petition proper contains no statement of the grounds relied on, being confined to the bald conclusion that the petitioner is “much aggrieved by the opinion,” and that an extension of time has been granted for its filing, followed by a prayer that the judgment be vacated, etc., concluding with a reference to an accompanying brief and argument. A petition to rehear should on its face show merits, that is, state a case; the brief and argument being in support thereof.

It is practically conceded in the combined brief and argument that the identical…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Milwaukee & Saint Paul Railway Co. v. KelloggSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. Ehrgott v. . Mayor, Etc., of City of N.Y.New York Court of Appeals · 1884
  3. Larson v. ChaseSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1891
  4. Hill v. WinsorMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1875
  5. Brown v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1882

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. Jarboe Livestock Commission Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1947
  2. Buquo v. Title Guaranty & Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1936
  3. McCollum v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Chemical Residential v. Donna HodgeCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API